Key to the prosecution’s argument was whether Rittenhouse provoked the crowd, which under Wisconsin law would have undercut the self-defense claim. “The defendant is not the only one in the world who has the right to self-defense.” “They have a right to protect themselves,” he said of the crowd. And it turns out he does,” Binger said, likening Rittenhouse to an active shooter. “He does nothing to demonstrate to the crowd that he isn’t a threat to kill again. Richards also blamed the men who were shot for their deaths or injuries, particularly Rosenbaum, whom he described as “irrational and crazy.” “I’m glad he shot him,” Richards said.īut Binger said it was the crowd that chased after Rittenhouse after he’d shot Rosenbaum-not Rittenhouse-who “reasonably” believed they were in imminent danger, as the teenager ran through the crowd waving a firearm. Hands and feet can cause great bodily harm,” Richards said, reminding jurors of the wording of self-defense law. “Every person who was shot was attacking Kyle: one with a skateboard, one with his hands, one with his feet, one with a gun. Richards insisted the video showed the opposite, and he described the skateboard that Huber used to hit Rittenhouse in the head as a “deadly weapon.” Richards said Rittenhouse could easily have been overpowered by the older men Binger said that Rosenbaum, whose killing sparked the pursuit that ended in the other shootings, was just 5’4” tall and 150 pounds, unarmed, and described by other witnesses as nothing more than a “babbling idiot.”īinger noted that only Grosskreutz had a firearm and said video showed he was retreating before being shot. Read more: Tensions Over Race and Policing in Kenosha, Wis., Began Long Before the Shooting of Jacob BlakeĮach side emphasized not just the matter of mindset, but the sizes of the people involved, their body language, and the objects in their hands at the time of the altercations, going through footage second-by-second to underscore their points. “My client didn’t shoot at anyone until he was chased and cornered,” countered defense attorney Mark Richards after showing jurors the same video, which jurors reviewed during their deliberations. “None of these people posed an imminent threat,” Binger said. His self-defense claim took center stage in closing statements as the defense and the prosecution seized on video of Rittenhouse firing his rifle to try to sway the jury to see things from opposing points of view. Jurors were tasked with deciding if Rittenhouse was reasonable in thinking he faced imminent death or bodily injury when he opened fire. Judge Schroeder’s own conduct, which included yelling at the prosecution team on several occasions, also drew attention. The trial featured several heated moments, and not just from the witnesses. I defended myself,” he said, at one point breaking down in heaving sobs that led the judge to call a recess. Please note comments are moderated before publication.Rittenhouse took the unusual step of taking the stand in his own defense and testified that Rosenbaum-who was unarmed-ambushed and threatened to kill him, and that he was then chased down by a “mob” before falling to the ground and opening fire again. Got a comment? Leave your thoughts in the comments section, below. WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK WITH LIVE TRIAL COMMENTARY HERE She believes this is one of the darkest days in American history. “We just legalized vigilantism”: A woman who supported a conviction in the Kyle Rittenhouse case said she was stunned by the not guilty verdict. Woman Who Hoped for a Conviction Stunned by Kyle Rittenhouse Acquittal Supporter Says He Knew Kyle Rittenhouse Was on the Side of JusticeĪ supporter of Kyle Rittenhouse told Law&Crime’s Angenette Levy that he knew Rittenhouse was on the side of justice and believed it was self-defense. Louis lawyers Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who pointed guns at protesters and received pardons after pleading guilty to misdemeanor charges, reacted to the not guilty verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. Louis Lawyers Who Pointed Guns at Protesters React to Kyle Rittenhouse Verdict. Law&Crime Network published this video item, entitled “Kyle Rittenhouse: Emotional Crowd Reaction Following Not Guilty Verdict” – below is their description.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |